Life of Pi Journal Response

The bank clerk of this hold up has his own view decisionly zoological gardenlogical gardens. He tries to make it seem as if his view is absolutely sure and is scientifically proven and that he is 100% politically correct. According to him a zoo to an animal is analogous a habitation to a human. exclusively I totally disagree with his view on the zoos. In the book the narrators view is totally opposite. He assumes and forecasts that keeping animals in confines is normal to them and they dont mind He persuades us to think that animals ar perfectly fine and find it normal to be unbroken in cages Animals alike(p) being in the same cages, its like their infrastructure, There is no place like home?Thats sure what animals feel. According to him animals would rather live in a restricted body politic where his basic needs argon met than live in an open domain of a function full of enemies and no guarantee of food. He is saying that a cage is an animals home How give the bounce that be possible? How can an animal call some cage where its been stuck for ever so and ever where it cant go anywhere, call it home?? It seems as if the narrator I personally do non agree with the narrators view somewhat zoos or any other enclosed dwelling for animals. We all human being k right away that animals do not like being kept in cages and in enclosed enclosures. Animals are territorial.That is the key to their minds. Only a known territorial get out allow them to fulfill the two relentless imperatives of the untamed the avoidance of enemies and the getting of food and water. So biologically sound zoo enclosure whether cage, pit, moated island, corral, terrarium, aviary or aquarium- is just another dominion In a zoo, we do for animals what we have done for ourselves with phratrys Now he is comparing the animals cages to our homes How is it possible to compare an animals cage to our houses? They are definitely vastly different.We cannot possibly compare a pl ace like our home to an animals cage. Animals are meant to live in the untamed in the forests, the desserts etc. Thats their home. Like our homes are our habitats in cities and commonwealth sides. Its not possible to call a cage, an animals territory its like a jail for him. A house is a compresses territory where basic needs can be fulfil close by and safely (with the noteworthy absence of a open fireplace or the like, present in every human habitation).Finding deep down it all the places it needs- a lookout, a place for resting, for eating and drinking, for bathing, for grooming-etc. nd decision that there is no need to go hunting, food appearing sextuplet days a week, an animal will take possession of its zoo space in the same way it would lay claim I disagree with the fact that the cages are the animals territory and home. scantily because the cage can fulfill the basic needs (resting, look out, eating, and bathing) that doesnt mean its territory. The animal is being fo rced to live in the cages and so it has to deal with the situation and cope with it. Where he says fulfilled by close by and safely he is wrong. The bars around the cage arent for safety for the animals but for hardly keeping it inside its cage.Its a safety for us How does this even make sense in the start place? Its basically saying that, someone a human is forced to live in a cage where he/she will be supplied with food and calling that cage their home Their safe, have a place to eat, rest, lookout Its the humans territory and home now because it will stay there forcefully until it dies You can similarly look at this like this. You see a lady card crawling around. So you take a jar and cover it atop it. You give it food/water daily So basically now the jar is its home sweet home and its own territory? Thats what the narrator is basically saying.I disagree with the fact that animals can be compared to humans. The narrator cannot simply just start comparing humans lifestyles to animals. How can we possibly know whether the cage is like a home to the animals? The animals belong in nature they have their own habitats and their own slipway of having a comfortable lifestyle. How can we say that a cage is a comfortable area and a home to an animal? We do not know what animals think, we dont know what they are saying until now though we see the animals in their enclosures all peaceful and quite we cannot simply assume that they love it.Its like we were separated from our families and put in a cage to stay human race and animals are very different. Humans are able to do things that animals cant They can come on houses out of nature (with wood etc). Animals are limited. They get raised and are taught to hunt so they can eat and live In remainder I defiantly do not agree with the narrator on the fact that animals love the zoo, and like being kept in cages/enclosures. I disagree with his view and opinion on zoos.