'Immigration Restriction Act Essay\r'

'in-migration childbed act- 1901\r\nThe in-migration barrier shape (1901) give nonice be argued was a policy enacted to consult the prejudices in Australian society at the age. The Immigration Restriction Act consisted of the Australian Parliament limiting immigration to Australia, which came to be kn suffer as The fresh Australia indemnity. The White Australia insurance policy consists of various historical laws that choose immigration to Australia from Britain only if strongly reject non- washrags or spate who are non of British descent. At the turn of the ascorbic acid Australia was still a relatively spic-and-span country. It’s population was 4 zillion, reasonably delicate, compared to other world populations. At the cartridge holder the general public consensus was that Australia should be a washcloth country and allowing indiscriminate immigration could threaten its individualism. The White Australia insurance had elicit support from Australia ’s white population, so it could be argued that its introduction was merely a reflection of the public’s ideals at the time.\r\nThis is reflected by historian Myra Willard: â€Å"…no motivating power, operated more universally on this continent, or in the beautiful is grease of Tasmania… than the desire that we should be one good deal, and remain one people, without the adulteration of other races.” Myra Willard, ‘History of the White Australia Policy to 1920’. Melbourne University Press, 1923. p 119 It is clear that white Australians were overzealous about preserving a white Australia. undoubtedly the federal Government was under a great deal of public pressure level to conform. By analysing the reasoning behind the Policy it was more than just an attempt to act up white culture. As the Parliamentary debates at the time convey, there was an argument that the white race was superior and non-whites were deemed inferior. The Prime look at the time Edmund Barton delivers this message to Parliament. â€Å"We are guarding the last part of the world in which the higher races can live and append sluttishly for the higher civilisation. I blot before the house a quantity of definite and high policy.” Although the White Australia Policy did become overwhelming support within Parliament and the public there were whatsoever who opposed the revolutionary policy.\r\nSome objections were do on moral grounds citing that the Laws were fell and offensive. â€Å"I have already admitted that it is our debt instrument to restrict the immigration of Asiatics… I cannot clear myself in the face of appeals exchangeable that, and in the face of the knowledge I have of India and Asia generally, to do anything in the insulting and vicious way proposed by the Bill….” commonwealth Parliamentary Debates’, November 13, 1901. p 7158 Opposition was as well as met with from Britain, which u mpteen Australian parliamentarians were concerned about. The British Government had warned against an outright ban ground on race and colour. The Immigration Restriction Act would be contrary to the British principle of equality and would deeply break down their Indian subjects and their Japanese allies. Despite Britain’s clear objections many were still hustling to support the Bill even if it meant break ties with Britain. This is cl premature expressed by William Morris Hughes: â€Å"We unavoidableness a White Australia and are we to be denied it because we shall offend the Japanese or immobilise His Majesty’s ministers? I bring forward not… If we are to go on making things smooth for His Majesty’s Government- if our first and only desire is to ascertain a policy to suit our own ends, then we know where we are. We have come, it appears to me, to the share of ways.” William Morris Hughes, ‘Commonwealth Parliamentary Debates’ S eptember 12, 1901. p 4825 Prior to 1901, immigration was controlled by the colonies.\r\nDuring the deluxe rush in the 1850’s many migrants came to Australia from around the world and wanted to situate there. While the majority were from Britain, 60,000 came from Continental Europe, 42,000 from China, 10,000 from the get together States and just over 5,000 from New Zealand and the sec Pacific. By the time of confederation the supply population was close to four million of whom one in four were born(p) overseas. The Australian colony was soon faulting to a population of unlike migrants. This leave Australians introduce policies that would control migration. The Australian colonies were oddly concerned with the amount of Chinese migrants and the conflicts that had arisen among the Chinese and white Australians settler. Prior to 1901 the compound States gathered to discuss ways of prohibiting Chinese migration and other migrants.\r\nThus when Australian Federation was formed, the Immigration Restriction Act was introduced as solution to the problem the colonial states had been facing. As a result the number of Chinese migrants decreased instantly. At face respect the Immigration Restriction Act was arguably racist and exclusionary. However in early 19th Century Australia it was widely viewed as a necessity. Australia was still a new country with a relatively small population. It was viewed worldwide as a land of prosperity and became popular for many to migrate there and seek their fortune. Had not the Federal Government implemented laws to regulate immigration Australia could have potentially lost its identity as a predominately White Nation. The Immigration Restriction Act appealed to people’s fears and the need for self preservation, and at the time this argument was fairly plausible.\r\nIn to each one and every avenue of life we happen upon the contention of the coloured races insidiously weirdo in, and if we are to maintain the st andard of biography we think necessary, in order that our people may be brought up with a degree of comfort, and with scholastic advantages which will contribute to the improvement and general advancement of the nation, some pause must be make in regard to the extension of the competition of the coloured aliens generally. (Member of parliament 1901). This quote understandably states that the majority of Parliament felt strongly about protecting Australia’s white identity. This was done in the face of underground from Britain and the likelihood of upsetting other countries like Japan. It was a bold step but the majority of Australians were determined. . The White Australia Policy was an burning(prenominal) chapter in Australian history. It had its benefits and limitations. It affected not just Australia but many people around the world. It was something that many countries were against and is very different to what Australia’s immigration policy is today.\r\nBIBLIOGR APHY\r\nImmigration Restriction Act 1901 †Wikipedia, the free cyclopedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_Restriction_Act_1901 USED ON: April 14th\r\nThe establishment Of The Immigration Restriction Act †first rudiment\r\nhttp://www.abc.net.au/federation/fedstory/ep2/ep2_events.htm USED ON: April twenty-sixth\r\nWhite Australia: Immigration Restriction Act 1901, Australia to 1914 http://www.skwirk.com.au/p-c_s-14_u-127_t-350_c-1213/history-of-racist-attitudes-and-fear/nsw/history/australia-to-1914/white-australia-immigration-restriction-act-1901 Copyright © 2013 Red orchard apple tree Education Ltd. All rights reserved. USED ON: April 14th\r\nWhite Australia policy †Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia\r\n'