'Superpower Has No Moral Duty to Intervene in Foreign Tyrannies\r'

'Lord Acton said â€Å"Power corrupts perfectly & deoxyadenosine monophosphate; absolute power corrupts absolutely. ” And it is no investigate that super power corrupts superbly. Honourable panel of the jury, reckon teachers & adenosine monophosphate; all my dear fri finish ups, and of course non to forget my worthy but disillusi atomic number 53d opponents, a very warm good afternoon to one & all. Nowadays the burning topic is whether force female genital organ involve in foreign affairs. forthwith I master Bright James George would uniform to speak against the motion ‘Superpower has a example work to intervene in foreign tyrannies.\r\nIn this contemporary world, power has a habit which they list as a ‘moral intervention’. further I refer this as ‘poking their schnoz in separate’s matter’. Since when the magnates rosaceous into this world, they found this intervention advantageous for them on the other hand harmful fo r others. I hope my opponents contend that every members of United Nations has to abide to its polity. In celestial latitude 1965, UN General Assembly had declared a policy stating that ‘no inelegant has to intervene in some(prenominal) affairs of other countries.\r\nMy opponents burn non turn a cover eye to these events: US-Vietnam war, Russia Chechnya Conflict. Is this what my opponents call these powers’ moral obligation by violating the UN policies? You got to think twice, my friends. I fail to understand why my opponents mean in the so called moral duty of superpower intervention. Do superpowers know other dry land’s background, culture, tradition etc.? They know single a little and remember little cognition is always dangerous. With a little knowledge how can they intervene in foreign tyrannies?\r\nIt doesn’t effective good too either. When a country allows superpower to intervene in their tyrannies, it shows the incapability of the govern ment to direct that country. Moreover all the success of that country becomes the resplendency of the superpower. What a shame then! A country must stand on its own foot. It can only seek help in a very critical situation. My opponents should not forget that in this politically cut-throat competitive world, one never intervenes unless & until if he or she gets a profit erupt of it. Superpowers do the same.\r\nThey only intervene in matters for amassing riches & especially to quench the thirst of discolor water, that is, petroleum. It is no doubt that the motive of the Iraq war was to shelter US frugal interests- American access to disconnectedness oil. Countries uniform the U. S. have misused its position as superpower says the global political scholar Francis Fukuyama claims â€Å" cardinal years since the fall of the Berlin Wall and the accepted end of the Cold War, the United States has misused its position as a superpower. ” When President Bush sent US t roop to Somalia in 1992, he cited a humanist reason: to feed the starving Somali Population.\r\nsolely paradoxically civil Order has broken down, and starvation was usedas a weapon against innocent people. The American troops were engaged in a manhunt for warlord Aideed. This led to fierce fire fight on October 3, 1993 the search was in futile. Nothing substantial was accomplished. Only misery & sorrow. Percy Bysshe Shelly in his Queen Mab says, â€Å"Power, like a desolating pestilence, Pollutes whate’er it touches; and obedience, Bane of all genius, virtue, freedom, truth, Makes slaves of men, and of the human frame A mechanized automaton. ”\r\nAccording to me, â€Å"Superpower, like a destructing nuisance, Pollutes whate’er it intervenes. ” For instance, the former Yugoslavia, the Serbs, Bosnians etc. fought for nationalism. But as the superpowers like Russia intervened for altruistic reasons, things became worse. The final result was the disinte gration of Yugoslavia. U. S & China doesn’t give India eternal membership in UN General Assembly. France accepted, UK accepted. Why not the Americans & the Chinese? Just a unspotted fear of India sightly superpower and superpower becoming soft power.\r\nAfraid of India becoming superpower, the present superpower USA provides arms & ammunitions to Pakistan, so as to suppress India. However my obstinate opponents are quiesce under the illusion of superpower intervention. Why superpower wants to involve in others matter, when they have problems like poverty, economic recession etc. in their country itself? To conclude, I would like to say â€Å"superpowers should not mess close to with some other countries till theirs is in order. ” ultimately those who believe that ‘Superpower has a moral duty to intervene in foreign tyrannies’ I believe they live in the fool’s paradise. thank you\r\n'