'Compare and Contrast Ancient India and Egypt Combined Politics and Religion Essay\r'

'Compare and Contrast ancient India and Egypt feature politics and theology Through history, holiness has influence civilizations in several aspects. In ancient Indian and Egyptian civilizations it was very strong shaping agitate in governmental structures, but some(prenominal) the unearthly beliefs and the resulting political remains were divers(prenominal), just like pharaohs were assorted from rajas. The way Egyptians and Indians blended devotion with politics bears indisputable similarities. First of all, the fundamental role of priests, who were the Egyptians pharaohs roughly all-important(prenominal) advisors during the unused Kingdom and at integrity nous gained more power than the pharaoh himself.\r\nIn the other hand, in India priests or Brahmans were also important political figures since they were considered to be at the top of the coterie system and comprised the most educated portion of society. Also, in both civilizations religion became a way to rei nforce the government and check voluntaries to work during the summers to build the famous Egyptian pyramids. In India, on the other hand, the caste system and the theory of dharma taught the lower classes what their place in society, and this place was subordinated to the amphetamine classes and the government.\r\nDespite the similarities the influence of religion in the political life of both ancient civilizations displays some differences. For example, the pharaoh was considered a divine ruler, making him a leading priest, spot rajas were military figures and counterbalance after the rise of the caste system warriors confined with priests for power. Even Ashoka, the emperor of India who became a Buddhist monk, was not divine, eventhough his government gave Buddhism central importance.\r\nHere, we slew see yet another difference that started with the topic of Buddhism and Jainism in India, while in India more than maven religion (with Ashoka) while the Hindu caste system wa s still in practice, Egypt only had one central system of beliefs at a time. Even though the form of adore and the beliefs changed over time, only one sacred system held power at a time, even during the short period during which the pharaoh became monotheistic with Akhenaton and the worship of Aton, only this system held political power even if the people still worship the old Gods.\r\nBecause of this, priests and nobles overthrew this religious system in Egypt and regained their power. Even though religion was an important part of the Indian political system, neither rajas nor later emperors established a theocracy, while the Egyptian pharaohs did. In Egypt the pharaohs were religious and political figures, in fact, during the New Kingdom they had no standing army, while Rajas were warriors and the countenance of Indian emperors also derived from military power. This is due because Egyptian civilization was peaceful through most of its history, so religion, rather tan an army wa s used to exempt the pharaohs rule.\r\nIn India, on the other hand, Indo-Aryan tribes riddle through war, and the Indian empire was established by overthrowing the Macedonians through military conquest. So in both the positions of the Raja and the emperor were sustained by their exponent to conquer and subdue others, even during the reign of Asoka statecraft was used to expand the empires domains. As we crapper see, religion in India and Egypt became a factor of importance, but in clearly different ways and yielding different structures and interactions.\r\nThe religious and political structures of both ancient civilizations can be related to the Japanese mandate of heaven. This par can be made because in India and Egypt the leaders shared both religious and political situation; they were the supreme leaders in both aspects. In the mandate of Heaven Japanese political rulers, were alleged(a) to be enlightened or chosen by God to rule the empire. In conclusion the tether civi lizations had rulers in which were evolve both political and religiously.\r\n'